Automation & Workforce Transformation

Building a National Talent Pipeline for GCC Tourism

A GCC government tourism authority facing mandatory nationalisation requirements across all tourism sector functions. The local talent pool was both limited and unreliable — high turnover, salary and role expectations disconnected from market realities, low on-the-job motivation — compounded by questionable practices from staffing agencies and an educational infrastructure with insufficient capacity to produce the volume of qualified nationals the sector required over the following decade.

Root cause analysis structured across three layers: the talent supply side (educational institution capacity, curriculum relevance, graduate volumes); the demand side (employer practices, role design, career path visibility); and the intermediary layer (agency licensing standards, placement quality, accountability mechanisms). Turnover patterns, motivation barriers, and expectation mismatches were examined through structured stakeholder interviews and benchmarked against comparable nationalisation programmes elsewhere in the region.

A clear, evidence-based set of investment recommendations to build and strengthen the local talent pipeline — covering institutional capacity expansion, curriculum development priorities, and public-private partnership structures. A proposed policy framework to establish new standards for staffing agencies, including licensing criteria, placement quality metrics, and accountability mechanisms to reduce agency-driven distortions in the market.

"The analysis was unflinching about the structural nature of the problem." — Senior official, GCC tourism authority
Performance & Operations

Launching a Catering Offering for a Private Equity–Backed Fast Casual Chain

A private equity–owned fast casual restaurant chain operating approximately 160 points of sale wanted to launch a catering offering. The central strategic question was whether catering could be integrated into the existing restaurant network or required a dedicated off-premise model — including the potential use of ghost kitchen infrastructure.

A deep analysis of existing restaurant configurations, operational processes, and IT assets across the estate to determine integration feasibility. The study modelled the operational disruption a catering overlay would impose on in-restaurant operations, defined the changes required to the operating model under each scenario, and built a detailed financial projection that explicitly accounted for the known variability in catering demand. Branding and packaging decisions for the new offering were developed in parallel with the operational and financial work.

The catering offering was successfully launched. The go-to-market structure incorporated partner entities to absorb a portion of the cost of uncertainty and demand volatility — allowing the chain to enter the catering market without placing the full risk of an unproven revenue stream on its core restaurant operations. The launch was supported by a coherent brand identity and packaging suite developed as part of the engagement.

"The financial modelling gave us the confidence to launch — and the structure to do it without betting the core business on it." — Operations leadership, PE-backed fast casual group
Portfolio & Asset Advisory

Five-Year EBITDA Doubling Roadmap for a GCC Luxury Hospitality Group

A GCC-headquartered luxury hospitality group with an ambitious five-year objective to double EBITDA across its portfolio. The engagement operated at ownership level — working directly with the hotel management team and reporting to the asset owner and two asset managers — requiring both granular operational analysis at property level and portfolio-scale strategic thinking.

A department-by-department diagnostic across each property, benchmarking KPIs against international industry standards and locally based competitor figures. Eleven priority actions were identified per department — including increasing the contribution of the spa business, rethinking the F&B asset structure, and a series of revenue and cost optimisation levers specific to each property's market position. Recommended a doubling of the overall portfolio; built property-specific P&L projections in direct collaboration with the group's development team; constructed the full five-year financial model underpinning the strategic plan.

A comprehensive five-year strategic plan with a clear, fully modelled EBITDA doubling roadmap. The eleven-priority-action framework per department became the operating blueprint adopted by the management team. Asset managers received a property-by-property financial model built on explicit, validated assumptions — providing a level of underwriting rigour the portfolio had not previously had.

"The depth of the analysis — department by department, property by property — gave us a level of strategic clarity we had not had before." — Asset management team, GCC luxury hospitality group
Digital & Technology Strategy

Luxury Hotel Technology Benchmark for an Adriatic Hotel Group

An Adriatic luxury hotel group preparing the technology specification for its flagship pre-opening property. The decisions in question — what guests would see, what must never fail, and what would pay only in productivity — are all settled at design stage, and the group had no external reference point for what comparable properties had actually built. The risk was the familiar one at this tier: spending on visible technology sold as a feature, which returns nothing.

A benchmark of seventeen international luxury properties, each assessed across ten technology dimensions and scored on a common scale. The field was chosen to bracket the flagship on positioning, geography and build age: eleven properties in the densest concentration of new-build ultra-luxury anywhere, plus six global references spanning North America, Asia, the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean — including the two wellness-native comparators that sell an outcome rather than a room, a deliberate low-technology case, and a group-scale case. Every claim was graded on a four-tier evidence scale, from verified filings and regulator decisions down to single-source trade reporting, and sourced in full. Five confidential primary interviews with operators at benchmarked properties supplemented the published record.

Seventeen property assessments of eighteen to nineteen pages each, plus a consolidated synthesis, delivered as the outside view: what comparable properties have built, what it cost, and what the evidence for each claim is worth. The work was framed throughout as areas for exploration rather than recommendations, on the principle that a benchmark can establish what exists but not which of it fits a given brand strategy. It separated technology that must never fail from technology that earns its place as visible proof of a brand promise, and from technology that pays only in gross operating profit — the distinction that determines where the money goes. The benchmark forms the first of four sequenced steps, ahead of an internal maturity assessment, a working session with operators, and an action plan.

Further case studies will be published as engagements complete.

If you'd like to discuss a specific challenge, the best starting point is a discovery conversation.

Book a discovery call